blog:2019:0208_goat_case
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:2019:0208_goat_case [02/14/2019 18:58] – Alisssandra | blog:2019:0208_goat_case [06/11/2019 01:44] (current) – removed Alisssandra | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== goat case ====== | ||
- | |||
- | 30 goats seized taken due to hoof rot disease. 2 yrs prior Complaints that goats suffered hoof rot, but particular breed of goat naturally suffer hoof rot. When goats have dry condition hooves are fine, and in wet condition hooves become inflamed. When treated with zinc oxide helps subside inflammation. I don't know full detail of story. | ||
- | |||
- | 1. During 2 yr complaint period did owner ask for prior building permit to build safe enclosure for goats? | ||
- | |||
- | 2. Why wasn't a onsite vet available to examine goats on farm before seizure? Why was defendant denied right and transparency to be present at goat examination? | ||
- | |||
- | 3. Why was gag order set on defendant? | ||
- | |||
- | 4. Owner claims housing developments want owner out of business b/c they don't pay taxes for farmland? Who else experienced seizure of land? Correlation needed to be proven. | ||
- | |||
- | 5. How long were employees fired from date of seizure? | ||
- | |||
- | owner' | ||
- | for neglect. My assertion could be wrong. a vet examined goats day of seizure without owner present creates lack of transparency and honesty. Punishment far exceeded crime. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | {{tag> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
blog/2019/0208_goat_case.1550170709.txt.gz · Last modified: 02/14/2019 18:58 by Alisssandra