blog:2019:0208_goat_case
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
blog:2019:0208_goat_case [02/13/2019 18:01] – Alisssandra | blog:2019:0208_goat_case [02/14/2019 18:54] – Alisssandra | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== goat case ====== | ====== goat case ====== | ||
- | 30 goats seized taken due to hoof rot disease. 2 yrs prior Complaints | + | 30 goats seized taken due to hoof rot disease. 2 yrs prior Complaints |
- | When goats have dry condition hooves are fine, and in wet condition hooves become inflamed with level of wetness increase hooves sensitivity. I don't know full detail of story. | + | |
1. During 2 yr complaint period did owner ask for prior building permit to build safe enclosure for goats? | 1. During 2 yr complaint period did owner ask for prior building permit to build safe enclosure for goats? | ||
- | 2. Why wasn't vet able to examine goats day of seizure, and why was defendant denied right and transparency to be present at goat examination? | + | 2. Why wasn' |
3. Why was gag order set on defendant? | 3. Why was gag order set on defendant? | ||
- | 4. Owner claims housing developments want owner out of business b/c they don't pay taxes for farmland?, Who else experienced seizure of land? Correlation needed to be proven. | + | 4. Owner claims housing developments want owner out of business b/c they don't pay taxes for farmland? Who else experienced seizure of land? Correlation needed to be proven. |
5. How long were employees fired from date of seizure? | 5. How long were employees fired from date of seizure? | ||
owner' | owner' | ||
- | for neglect. My assertion could be wrong b/c a vet did not examine | + | for neglect. My assertion could be wrong. a vet examined |